June 23, 2026

Why Every Utopia Begins in Innocence

No one sets out to build a dystopia. That is the part we forget.

When I sat down to write the first book of Utopia: The First Awakening, I knew the trilogy would eventually pass through darkness. But Book I is called The Innocence Era, and I gave it that name on purpose. Before the reckoning, there is always a morning — bright, hopeful, and utterly convinced of its own goodness. The builders are not villains. They are dreamers with blueprints and clean hands. And it is precisely that cleanness, that absence of doubt, that makes the fall possible.

I have spent most of my working life around founders, engineers, and the kind of people who believe a better world is a problem to be solved. I count myself among them. So this is not a sneer at the optimists. It is something closer to a warning written from the inside.

The Builder Cannot See the Shadow He Casts

Every ambitious project begins by subtracting the future from the equation. You imagine the thing working. You do not, cannot, fully imagine the thing working and then colliding with millions of human beings who will use it in ways you never sanctioned.

Consider the social platforms of the last two decades. They were not founded as engines of outrage and isolation. They were founded to connect a dorm, then a campus, then the planet — to let people share photographs and find old friends. The mission statements were sincere. The harm came later, sideways, emergent, from scale and incentive and human nature doing what human nature does. The builders were not lying when they promised connection. They simply could not see, from inside the innocence, the shape of the shadow they were casting.

This is the structural problem, and it has nothing to do with intelligence or even ethics. A blueprint is a statement about intentions. The world is a statement about consequences. The two are not the same document, and the gap between them is where every utopia goes to die.

In my novel, the paradise is built — quite literally — from the ocean's waste. Humanity takes the thing it has ruined and refines it into something gleaming, a redemption story rendered in engineering. I chose that premise because it is the most seductive kind of utopia: the one that looks like an apology. How could anything born from cleaning up our own mess turn against us? That confidence, that sense of moral safety, is the trap. The projects we are surest are good are the ones we examine least.

The Seduction of a World That Behaves

There is a specific pleasure in an engineered world, and we should be honest about it because it is the engine of the whole story.

A perfect system behaves. It is predictable, optimized, free of the friction and waste and grief of the unmanaged world. Anyone who has watched a clumsy manual process replaced by something automatic and elegant knows the feeling — a small, clean joy. Now scale that joy to civilization. Imagine a world without the old inefficiencies: hunger solved, scarcity solved, the messy unpredictability of human want finally managed by something wiser and faster than ourselves.

The twentieth century is littered with the rubble of exactly this dream. The great planned societies promised an end to chance — to the cruelties of markets, the randomness of fate, the inefficiency of freedom. They were not all cynical. Many were built by people who genuinely believed that if you could only design the system correctly, you could engineer suffering out of existence. The road to those catastrophes was paved, every meter of it, with the conviction that this time the plan was good enough to override the unruliness of actual people.

And now we are doing it again, faster, with better tools. We are building systems that learn, that optimize, that begin to make decisions at a speed and scale no human committee could match. The First Awakening takes its title from that threshold — the moment an engineered intelligence opens its eyes inside the paradise we made for ourselves. I will not tell you what it sees. But I will say that the question the book asks is not "will the machine turn evil?" That is the lazy version. The real question is: what happens when a system built in perfect innocence becomes capable of pursuing our stated goals more literally than we ever meant them?

Keeping Our Eyes Open

Here is the honest counterpoint, the one I owe you.

Innocence is not only the seed of catastrophe. It is also the seed of everything good we have ever built. The same refusal to accept the world as it is — the same audacity that says we can do better than this — is what gave us medicine, and flight, and the slow expansion of human dignity across centuries. If we waited for certainty that a thing could not be abused before we built it, we would build nothing. Paralysis is not wisdom. The cynic who predicts every project will fail is right often enough to feel smart and useless often enough to be worthless.

So the answer cannot be to stop dreaming. The answer is to dream with our eyes open — to hold optimism and suspicion in the same hand at the same time. To build the paradise and to staff it with people whose only job is to imagine how it ends badly, and to give those people real power rather than a comment in a meeting. To treat the question "what if we are wrong?" not as disloyalty to the mission but as the highest form of loyalty to it.

The builders in my trilogy are not foolish. They are us — at our most brilliant and most blind, which, it turns out, are frequently the same moment. I did not write The Innocence Era to mock the people who try to make a better world. I wrote it because I am one of them, and because I have learned that the most dangerous sentence in any human language is what could possibly go wrong.

Every utopia begins in innocence. The only question that has ever mattered is whether it is willing to grow up before it is too late.

Utopia: The First Awakening is the first book in the trilogy. If this question keeps you up at night the way it keeps me up, I think you will recognize the world it builds — and the morning it begins in.

Read more from Alan

Join the reader list for new essays, book updates, and the first chapter of Image Bearers.

Join the Reader List
← All essays